Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 38-47 , January 2003

Driving Ability Under Long-Term Treatment with Transdermal Fentanyl

  • Rainer Sabatowski, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: Rainer Sabatowski, MD, Pain Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany
    • Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • ,
  • Susanne Schwalen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Medical Affairs Department, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Neuss, Germany
  • ,
  • Klaus Rettig, MS

      Affiliations

    • Bureau of Evaluation and Quality Assurance in Medicine, Meerbusch, Germany
  • ,
  • Klaus W Herberg, MD

      Affiliations

    • Technischer Überwachungsverein GmbH, Cologne, Germany
  • ,
  • Stephan M Kasper, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • ,
  • Lukas Radbruch, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

,Accepted 25 February 2002.

  • Image Result

    TAVT score. The number of mistakes in the testing of tachistoscopic perception showing significant non-inferiority in the intent-to-treat (ITT) group as well as in the per-protocol-group (PP) compared

    TAVT score. The number of mistakes in the testing of tachistoscopic perception showing significant non-inferiority in the intent-to-treat (ITT) group as well as in the per-protocol-group (PP) compared to the control group (ITT: P = 0.004; PP: P = 0.003). Results of the control group are shown as raw values.

  • Image Result
    Sum score. Sum score of the z-transformed DT, COG, and TAVT, representing the cognitive items of the test battery. The PP-group was shown to be significantly non-inferior to the control group (P = 0.0

    Sum score. Sum score of the z-transformed DT, COG, and TAVT, representing the cognitive items of the test battery. The PP-group was shown to be significantly non-inferior to the control group (P = 0.036); the ITT group did not differ significantly from the control group (P = 0.188). The full circles represent the mean score plus the calculated delta as described in the method section. The values of the control group of the ITT- and the PP-group differ due to the different samples used in the z-transformation.

  • Image Result
    Percentage of passed tests. The percentage of patients who passed the five tests (i.e., scored above the 16th percentile) showed no difference between the ITT-, PP- and control groups (ITT-group: n =

    Percentage of passed tests. The percentage of patients who passed the five tests (i.e., scored above the 16th percentile) showed no difference between the ITT-, PP- and control groups (ITT-group: n = 30 in DT, COG and TAVT; n = 29 in 2-Hand and VIG; PP-group: n = 21 in DT, COG and TAVT; n = 20 in 2-Hand and VIG; Control-group: n = 90 in all tests).

PII: S0885-3924(02)00539-0

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 38-47 , January 2003