Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 420-429, April 2008

Tetrodotoxin for Moderate to Severe Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Design Multicenter Study

  • Neil A. Hagen, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary and Alberta Cancer Board, Calgary, Alberta
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Neil A. Hagen, MD, FRCPC, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, 1331-29 Street NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N2.
  • ,
  • Patrick du Souich, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec
  • ,
  • Bernard Lapointe, MD

      Affiliations

    • Palliative Care Program, Sir Mortimer B. Davis – Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec
  • ,
  • May Ong-Lam, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia
  • ,
  • Benoit Dubuc, MD

      Affiliations

    • Pain Clinic, CHUM – Hotel Dieu, Montréal, Québec
  • ,
  • David Walde, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Algoma Regional Cancer Program/Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
  • ,
  • Robin Love, MD, CCFP

      Affiliations

    • Nanaimo Regional General Hospital, Nanaimo, British Columbia
  • ,
  • Anh Ho Ngoc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Wex Pharmaceuticals, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • ,
  • on Behalf of the Canadian Tetrodotoxin Study Group

Accepted 4 June 2007. published online 13 February 2008.

Abstract 

Cancer pain is a serious public health issue and more effective treatments are needed. This study evaluates the analgesic activity of tetrodotoxin, a highly selective sodium channel blocker. This randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel design study of subcutaneous tetrodotoxin, in patients with moderate or severe unrelieved cancer pain persisting despite best available treatment, involved 22 centers across Canada. The design called for tetrodotoxin administered subcutaneously over Days 1–4 with a period of observation to Day 15 or longer. All patients could enroll into an open-label extension efficacy and safety trial. The primary endpoint was the proportion of analgesic responders in each treatment arm. Eighty-two patients were randomized, and results on 77 were available for analysis. There was a nonstatistically significant trend toward more responders in the active treatment arm based on the primary endpoint (pain intensity difference). However, analysis of secondary endpoints, and an exploratory post hoc analysis, suggested there may be a robust analgesic effect if a composite endpoint is used, including either fall in pain level, or fall in opioid dose, plus improvement in quality of life. Most patients described transient perioral tingling or other mild sensory phenomena within about an hour of each treatment. Nausea and other toxicities were generally mild, but one patient experienced a serious, adverse event, truncal and gait ataxia. This trial suggests tetrodotoxin may potentially relieve moderate to severe, treatment-resistant cancer pain in a large proportion of patients, and often for prolonged periods following treatment, but further study is warranted using a composite primary endpoint.

Key Words: Cancer pain, analgesic, controlled clinical trial, tetrodotoxin

 

 This study was funded by WEX Pharmaceuticals Inc.

PII: S0885-3924(07)00744-0

doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.011

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 420-429, April 2008