Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 36, Issue 4 , Pages 335-350, October 2008

Eliciting Individual Preferences About Death: Development of the End-of-Life Preferences Interview

  • Claudia Borreani, PsyD

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Psychology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Claudia Borreani, PsyD, Unit of Psychology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.
  • ,
  • Cinzia Brunelli, ScD

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Psychology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan
  • ,
  • Guido Miccinesi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Epidemiology Unit, Center for Study and Prevention of Cancer, Florence
  • ,
  • Piero Morino, MD

      Affiliations

    • Palliative Care Unit, ASL 10, Florence
  • ,
  • Massimo Piazza, MD

      Affiliations

    • Palliative Care Unit, ASL 10, Florence
  • ,
  • Laura Piva, MD

      Affiliations

    • Palliative Care Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • ,
  • Marcello Tamburini, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Psychology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan

Accepted 1 November 2007. published online 28 April 2008.

Abstract 

The capability to make decisions about one's own dying and death is commonly considered a necessary component of a good death, but difficulties in communicating about imminent death have been documented. This paper attempts to describe the process of constructing an instrument to elicit individual preferences concerning dying, while respecting the patient's awareness, and to verify its applicability in a palliative care setting. The development of the End-of-Life Preferences Interview (ELPI) was performed through (a) a literature search aimed at identifying relevant issues; (b) examination by a panel of experts in the field of palliative care of the items generated; and (c) pretesting of feasibility on all eligible consecutive patients referred to three centers of palliative care during a two-month period. The final version of the ELPI consisted of two parts: The first level explores preferences about issues regarding the caregiving process, and the second level focuses on preparation for death. Each of the two parts is introduced by key questions aimed at allowing the patient to decide whether and when to stop exploring such sensitive matters. Among the 49 eligible patients (41%), the interview was proposed to only 13 of them (27%), and only one of them refused. The reasons for such a low compliance of physicians in proposing the ELPI were evaluated by a semi-structured interview and are herein discussed. The use of the ELPI in clinical practice can favor the passage to a greater consideration of the self-determination of the patient at the end of life, with due consideration of his or her cultural and emotional needs.

Key Words: End-of-life preferences, advance directives, communication

 

 The study was supported by grants from the University Research Center Virgilio Floriani for Palliative Therapy in Incurable and Terminal Patients, with the support of the Foundation Lu.V.I. Onlus.

PII: S0885-3924(08)00140-1

doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.10.013

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 36, Issue 4 , Pages 335-350, October 2008