Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 124-133, July 2009

Atropine, Hyoscine Butylbromide, or Scopolamine Are Equally Effective for the Treatment of Death Rattle in Terminal Care

  • Hans Wildiers, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Hans Wildiers, MD, PhD, Department of General Medical Oncology/Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
  • ,
  • Chris Dhaenekint

      Affiliations

    • Palliative Care Unit, A.Z. Sint-Elisabeth, Turnhout, Belgium
  • ,
  • Peter Demeulenaere, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  • ,
  • Paul M.J. Clement, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    • Palliative Care Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Mark Desmet, MD

      Affiliations

    • Palliative Care Unit, A.Z. Virga Jesse, Hasselt, Belgium
  • ,
  • Rita Van Nuffelen

      Affiliations

    • Palliative Care Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Jacques Gielen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Palliative Care Unit, A.Z. Sint-Elisabeth, Turnhout, Belgium
  • ,
  • Erna Van Droogenbroeck, MD

      Affiliations

    • Palliative Care Unit, Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
  • ,
  • Filip Geurs, MD

      Affiliations

    • Palliative Care Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Halle, Belgium
  • ,
  • Jean-Pierre Lobelle, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Johan Menten, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Palliative Care Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Flemish Federation of Palliative Care

Accepted 8 August 2008. published online 10 April 2009.

Abstract 

Death rattle is a frequent symptom (25%–50%) in the terminal stage of life, but there is neither standardized treatment nor prospective investigation performed on the effectiveness of anticholinergic drugs. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of three different anticholinergic drugs in the treatment of death rattle in the terminal stage of life. Terminal patients who developed death rattle were randomly assigned 0.5mg atropine, 20mg hyoscine butylbromide, or 0.25mg scopolamine. Each treatment was initiated with a subcutaneous bolus, which was followed by continuous administration of the same drug. The intensity of death rattle and side effects were prospectively scored at different time points. Three hundred and thirty-three eligible patients were randomized to atropine, hyoscine butylbromide, or scopolamine after informed consent from the patient or the appointed representative. For the three drugs, death rattle decreased to a nondisturbing intensity or disappeared after one hour in 42%, 42%, and 37% of cases, respectively (P=0.72). Further, effectiveness improved over time without significant differences among the treatment groups (effectiveness at 24 hours was 76%, 60%, and 68%, respectively). In an analysis on the three groups together, treatment was more effective when started at a lower initial rattle intensity; median survival after start of therapy was 23.9 hours. These data suggest that there are no significant differences in effectiveness or survival time among atropine, hyoscine butylbromide, and scopolamine in the treatment of death rattle.

Key Words: Death rattle, palliative care, terminally ill, scopolamine, atropine, hyoscine butylbromide, antimuscarinic drugs, anticholinergic therapy, hospice care

 

 Apart from a small unrestricted grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim of 500 euros, there was no financial support for this study, and no funding source had any role in study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, or the writing of the report.H. Wildiers was the study chair, who conceived and designed the study and wrote the protocol in collaboration with J. Menten. C. Dhaenekint, P. Clement, M. Desmet, R. Van Nuffelen, J. Gielen, E. Van Droogenbroeck, and F. Geurs were active in the recruitment of eligible patients. P. Demeulenaere was responsible for data management and site quality control. J.-P. Lobelle performed the statistical analysis. All of these authors assisted in the review of the report and approved the final manuscript.

PII: S0885-3924(09)00307-8

doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.07.007

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 124-133, July 2009