Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 39, Issue 1 , Pages 9-22 , January 2010

The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): Empirical Domains and Theoretical Perspectives

  • Lois Downey, MA

      Affiliations

    • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Lois Downey, MA, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359765, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
    • ,
  • J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
    • ,
  • William E. Lafferty, MD

      Affiliations

    • Office of Health Services and Public Health Outcomes Research, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
    • ,
  • Jerald R. Herting, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychosocial and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
    • Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
    • ,
  • Ruth A. Engelberg, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

,Accepted 14 May 2009.

References 

  1. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, et al. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476–2482
  2. Downey L, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR, Lafferty WE, Patrick DL. Shared priorities for the end-of-life period. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;37:175–188
  3. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. The promise of a good death. Lancet. 1998;351(Suppl 2):21–29
  4. Byock IR, Merriman MP. Measuring quality of life for patients with terminal illness: the Missoula-VITAS quality of life index. Palliat Med. 1998;12:231–244
  5. Singer PA, Martin DK, Kelner M. Quality end-of-life care: patients' perspectives. JAMA. 1999;281:163–168
  6. Martin DK, Thiel EC, Singer PA. A new model of advance care planning: observations from people with HIV. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:86–92
  7. Fowler FJ, Coppola KM, Teno JM. Methodological challenges for measuring quality of care at the end of life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999;17:114–119
  8. Stewart AL, Teno J, Patrick DL, Lynn J. The concept of quality of life of dying persons in the context of health care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999;17:93–108
  9. Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, et al. In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:825–832
  10. Emanuel LL, Alpert HR, DeWitt CB, Emanuel EJ. What terminally ill patients care about: toward a validated construct of patients' perspectives. J Palliat Med. 2000;3:419–431
  11. Patrick DL, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR. Evaluating the quality of dying and death. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22:717–726
  12. Teno JM, Clarridge B, Casey V, Edgman-Levitan S, Fowler J. Validation of toolkit after-death bereaved family member interview. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22:752–758
  13. Steinhauser KE, Bosworth HB, Clipp EC, et al. Initial assessment of a new instrument to measure quality of life at the end of life. J Palliat Med. 2002;5:829–841
  14. Cohen SR, Leis A. What determines the quality of life of terminally ill cancer patients from their own perspective?. J Palliat Care. 2002;18:48–58
  15. Pierson CM, Curtis JR, Patrick DL. A good death: a qualitative study of patients with advanced AIDS. AIDS Care. 2002;14:587–598
  16. Chochinov HM, Hack T, McClement S, Kristjanson L, Harlos M. Dignity in the terminally ill: a developing empirical model. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:433–443
  17. Schwartz CE, Mazor K, Rogers J, Ma Y, Reed G. Validation of a new measure of concept of a good death. J Palliat Med. 2003;6:575–584
  18. Bosworth HB, Steinhauser KE, Orr M, et al. Congestive heart failure patients' perceptions of quality of life: the integration of physical and psychosocial factors. Aging Ment Health. 2004;8:83–91
  19. Cohen LM, Germain MJ. Measuring quality of dying in end-stage renal disease. Semin Dial. 2004;17:376–379
  20. Emanuel L, Bennett K, Richardson VE. The dying role. J Palliat Med. 2007;10:159–168
  21. Knight SJ, Emanuel L. Processes of adjustment to end-of-life losses: a reintegration model. J Palliat Med. 2007;10:1190–1198
  22. Munn JC, Zimmerman S, Hanson LC, et al. Measuring the quality of dying in long-term care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1371–1879
  23. Steinhauser KE. Measuring end-of-life care outcomes prospectively. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(Suppl 1):S30–S41
  24. George LK. Research design in end-of-life research: state of science. Gerontologist. 2002;42(Spec. No. 3):86–98
  25. Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday; 1959;
  26. Turner RH. Role taking: process versus conformity. In:  Rose AM editors. Human behavior and social processes: An interactionist approach. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1962;p. 20–40
  27. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Awareness contexts and social interaction. In:  Fulton R editors. Death and identity. Revised ed.. Bowie, MD: Charles Press Publishers; 1976;p. 144–158
  28. Wells LE, Stryker S. Stability and change in self over the life course. In:  Baltes PB,  Featherman DL,  Lerner RM editor. Life-span development and behavior. Vol. 8:Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988;p. 191–229
  29. Ichiyama MA. The reflected appraisal process in small-group interaction. Soc Psychol Q. 1993;56:87–99
  30. Cast AD, Stets JE, Burke PJ. Does the self conform to the views of others?. Soc Psychol Q. 1999;62:68–82
  31. Stryker S. Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press; 2003;
  32. Hewitt JP. Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology. 9th ed.. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2003;
  33. In:  Burke PJ,  Owens TJ,  Serpe R,  Thoits PA editor. Advances in identity theory and research. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2003;
  34. Francis LE. Feeling good, feeling well: identity, emotion, and health. In:  Burke PJ,  Owens TJ,  Serpe RT,  Thoits PA editor. Advances in identity theory and research. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2003;p. 123–134
  35. Burke PJ. Identity change. Soc Psychol Q. 2006;69:81–96
  36. Koole SL, Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T. Introducing science to the psychology of the soul: experimental existential psychology. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006;15:212–216
  37. Charmaz K. The social reality of death: Death in contemporary America. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1980;
  38. Field D. Awareness and modern dying. Mortality (Abingdon, England). 1996;1:255–265
  39. Parker-Oliver D. The social construction of the “dying role” and the hospice drama. Omega (Westport). 1999–2000;40:493–512
  40. Valentine C. The “moment of death.”. Omega (Westport). 2007;55:219–236
  41. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Engelberg RA, et al. A measure of the quality of dying and death: initial validation using after-death interviews with family members. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;24:17–31
  42. Engelberg RA, Patrick DL, Curtis JR. Correspondence between patients' preferences and surrogates' understandings for dying and death. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005;30:498–509
  43. Downey L, Diehr P, Standish LJ, et al. Might massage or guided meditation provide “means to a better end”? Primary outcomes from an efficacy trial with patients at the end of life. J Palliat Care. 2009;25:100–108
  44. Quality of Death and Dying Questionnaire (original interview instrument). Available from http://depts.washington.edu/eolcare/instruments/uwqodd-soadi.pdfAccessed April 7, 2009
  45. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press; 2006;
  46. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user's guide. 4th ed.. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 1998–2006;
  47. Yu C-Y. Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles: UCLA; 2002;[dissertation]
  48. Chochinov HM, Kristjanson LJ, Hack TF, et al. Dignity in the terminally ill: revisited. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:666–672
  49. Block SD. Psychological considerations, growth, and transcendence at the end of life: the art of the possible. JAMA. 2001;285:2898–2905
  50. Singer PA, MacDonald N. Bioethics for clinicians: quality end-of-life care. CMAJ. 1998;159:159–162
  51. Hanson LC, Henderson M, Menon M. As individual as death itself: a focus group study of terminal care in nursing homes. J Palliat Med. 2002;5:117–125
  52. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, et al. Preparing for the end of life: preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22:727–737
  53. Vig EK, Pearlman RA. Quality of life while dying: a qualitative study of terminally ill older men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1595–1601
  54. Byock I. Dying well: Peace and possibilities at the end of life. New York: Riverhead Books; 1997;
  55. Charmaz K. Loss of self: a fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociol Health Illn. 1983;5:168–195
  56. Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, Tulsky JA. Evolution in measuring the quality of dying. J Palliat Med. 2002;5:407–414
  57. Steinhauser KE, Voils CI, Clipp EC, et al. Are you at peace?” One item to probe spiritual concerns at the end of life. Ann Intern Med. 2006;166:101–105
  58. Chochinov HM, Kristjanson LJ, Hack TF, et al. Burden to others and the terminally ill. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34:463–471
  59. Tilden VP, Tolle S, Drach L, Hickman S. Measurement of quality of care and quality of life at the end of life. Gerontologist. 2002;42(Spec. No. 3):71–80
  60. Teno JM. Measuring end-of-life care outcomes retrospectively. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(Suppl 1):S42–S49
  61. Higginson I, Priest P, McCarthy M. Are bereaved family members a valid proxy for a patient's assessment of dying?. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:553–557
  62. Hinton J. How reliable are relatives' retrospective reports of terminal illness? Patients' and relatives' accounts compared. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43:1229–1236
  63. National Center for Health Statistics. Deaths by place of death, age, race, and sex: United States, 2002. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/mortfinal2002_work309.pdfAccessed March 28, 2008
  64. U.S. Census Bureau. Educational attainment of people 18 years and over, by metropolitan and nonmetropolitan residence, age, sex, race and Hispanic origin: March 2002. Available from http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/education/ppl-169/tab11.pdfAccessed March 28, 2008
  65. Hales S, Zimmermann C, Rodin G. The quality of dying and death. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:912–918

 The following organizations provided financial support for the studies included in this article: 1) The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation—Missoula study, 2) Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research grant #R03 HS09540—hospice study, 3) National Cancer Institute grant #5 R01 CA106204—clinical trial, and 4) Lotte & John Hecht Memorial Foundation—clinical trial.

PII: S0885-3924(09)00737-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.012

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 39, Issue 1 , Pages 9-22 , January 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution