Journal Home
Search for

Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 167-179 (February 2010)


View previous. 7 of 250 View next.

Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of THC:CBD Extract and THC Extract in Patients with Intractable Cancer-Related Pain

Jeremy R. Johnson, MB ChBa, Mary Burnell-Nugent, MB BChirb, Dominique Lossignol, MB ChB, MRCG, DRCOGc, Elena Doina Ganae-Motan, MDd, Richard Potts, BSc (Hons), MICRe, Marie T. Fallon, MB ChB, MD, FRCP (E), FRCP (Glasg)fCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Accepted 22 June 2009. published online 06 November 2009.

Abstract 

This study compared the efficacy of a tetrahydrocannabinol:cannabidiol (THC:CBD) extract, a nonopioid analgesic endocannabinoid system modulator, and a THC extract, with placebo, in relieving pain in patients with advanced cancer. In total, 177 patients with cancer pain, who experienced inadequate analgesia despite chronic opioid dosing, entered a two-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients were randomized to THC:CBD extract (n = 60), THC extract (n = 58), or placebo (n = 59). The primary analysis of change from baseline in mean pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score was statistically significantly in favor of THC:CBD compared with placebo (improvement of −1.37 vs. −0.69), whereas the THC group showed a nonsignificant change (−1.01 vs. −0.69). Twice as many patients taking THC:CBD showed a reduction of more than 30% from baseline pain NRS score when compared with placebo (23 [43%] vs. 12 [21%]). The associated odds ratio was statistically significant, whereas the number of THC group responders was similar to placebo (12 [23%] vs. 12 [21%]) and did not reach statistical significance. There was no change from baseline in median dose of opioid background medication or mean number of doses of breakthrough medication across treatment groups. No significant group differences were found in the NRS sleep quality or nausea scores or the pain control assessment. However, the results from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Questionnaire showed a worsening in nausea and vomiting with THC:CBD compared with placebo (P = 0.02), whereas THC had no difference (P = 1.0). Most drug-related adverse events were mild/moderate in severity. This study shows that THC:CBD extract is efficacious for relief of pain in patients with advanced cancer pain not fully relieved by strong opioids.

a Severn Hospice, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, United Kingdom

b St. Luke's Hospice, Turnchapel, Plymouth, United Kingdom

c Association Hospitaliere De Brussels, Centre des Tumeurs de l'ULB, Brussels, Belgium

d Emergency Department, Hospital “Sf. Ioan cel Nou,” Suceava, Romania

e GW Pharma Ltd. , Ely, Cambridgeshire

f Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Marie T. Fallon, MD, St. Columba’s Hospice Chair of Palliative Medicine, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, United Kingdom.

 This study was sponsored by GW Pharma Ltd. All study medication was supplied by GW Pharma Ltd., and it also funded all sites involved in the study by means of per-patient payments based on recruitment. GW Pharma Ltd. has funded J. R. Johnson (primary author) to attend two conferences to present the results of this study.

PII: S0885-3924(09)00787-8

doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.008


View previous. 7 of 250 View next.