« Previous
Next »
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 39, Issue 2
, Pages 241-249
, February 2010
A Single Set of Numerical Cutpoints to Define Moderate and Severe Symptoms for the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System
References
- Cancer symptom assessment instruments: a systemic review. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1459–1473
- . The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991;7:6–9
- . The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: a 15-year retrospective review of validation studies (1991–2006). Palliat Med. 2008;22:111–122
- . Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Cancer. 2000;88:2164–2171
- . The use of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) within a palliative care unit in the UK. Palliat Med. 1998;12:75–82
- Self-reported symptom experience of critically ill cancer patients receiving intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:277–282
- . Cross sectional validity of a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in dialysis patients: a simple assessment of symptom burden. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1621–1625
- . Role of cutpoints: why grade pain intensity?. Pain. 2005;113:5–6
- Use of a single-item screening tool to detect clinically significant fatigue, pain, distress, and anorexia in ambulatory cancer practice. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008;35:20–30
- . A prospective study to compare three depression screening tools in patients who are terminally ill. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;26:384–389
- The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System as a screening tool for depression and anxiety. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:296–303
- . When is cancer pain mild, moderate, or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function. Pain. 1995;61:277–284
- Mild, moderate, or severe pain categorized by patients with cancer with bony metastases. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:850–853
- Assessment of clinical relevant fatigue level in cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:891–896
- . Categorizing the severity of cancer pain: further exploration of the establishment of cutpoints. Pain. 2005;113:37–44
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (v.1.2008), cancer-related fatigue. Available from http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/fatigue.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2008.
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (v.1.2008), adult cancer pain. Available from http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/pain.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2008.
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (v.1.2008), Distress Management. Available from http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/distress.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2008.
- Mid Trent Cancer Network-Palliative Care Group. Palliative care cancer pain standards, guidelines and patient information for hospitals July, 2005. Available from http://www.information4u.org.uk/files/Hospital%20Guidelines%20For%20Nottingham%20July%202005.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2008.
- . Cancer pain relief. Geneva, IL: World Health Organization; 1986;
- . Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate and severe pain. Pain. 2001;109:317–322
- . Cutpoints for mild, moderate and severe pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee ready for joint replacement surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:55–63
- The association between pain and disability. Pain. 2004;112:307–314
- Lessons learned from a multiple-dose post-operative analgesic trial. Pain. 2004;109:103–109
- . Identification of cut-points for mild, moderate and severe pain due to diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Pain. 2005;115:29–36
- . Development of a metric for a day of manageable pain control: derivation of pain severity cut-points for low back pain and osteoarthritis. Pain. 2003;106:35–42
PII: S0885-3924(09)00843-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.010
© 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 39, Issue 2
, Pages 241-249
, February 2010
