Volume 39, Issue 2 , Pages e1-e5, February 2010
Re: Update on Cancer Pain Guidelines
Article Outline
To the Editor:
Caraceni et al.1 draw attention to a much needed discussion about the use of opioids in the management of cancer pain, and the work that is being currently undertaken to update the World Health Organization's (WHO) and European Association for Palliative Care's guidelines is timely. Morphine, for instance, one of the most traditional and commonly used opioids, has held a fundamental role in managing cancer pain,1 yet confusion around starting doses, titration, and maintenance in its use is still widespread. Morphine prescribing has been benchmarked for many years and guidelines produced, which formed the basis of other opioid prescribing advice.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Despite this, prescribing errors and criminal overdoses have been responsible for deaths in the UK.14, 15, 16, 17 This prompted us to review published guidance and identify discrepancies and variations in these texts.
Methods
A review of commonly used guidelines for opioids in the United Kingdom was conducted. Four palliative care physicians from two different U.K. centers suggested reference materials commonly used by palliative care, oncology, and primary care doctors when prescribing oral morphine. After recommendations from both centers, 15 sources were agreed upon, taking into account nationally recommended or widely used prescribing resources, such as the British National Formulary (BNF); online educational resources, including www.palliativedrugs.com; online guidelines, such as the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); and other Internet resources that doctors may access for advice (such as www.bmj.com). Furthermore, key textbooks, the ABC of Palliative Care and the Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine, were included as likely sources of guidance on morphine prescribing. Online information sources such as Wikipedia were excluded, as the authors felt it unlikely that doctors would base their prescribing decisions on public information sites and suppliers.
We subsequently set a consensus approach to reviewing the literature and what aspects we wanted to focus on. The following six questions were asked when reviewing the guidance:
It was felt by all four authors that these were areas that should be a baseline standard for all guidance on morphine prescribing.
Results
A review of the 15 sources (Table 1) demonstrated marked variations.17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 Some made little or no mention of starting doses, titration advice, or advice on upper limits. Starting doses for opioid-naive patients varied from 6 to 60
mg per 24 hours, whereas titration advice varied from increasing the dose by 30% every 2–3 days to 50% four hours after the previous dose. Suggested upper limits for oral morphine ranged from 300
mg/24
hours, through 3000
mg/24
hours, to statements that there is no maximum dose.
Table 1. Prescribing Advice for Oral Morphine in Adults from Palliative Care Sources
| Source | Oral Morphine Starting Dose for Patients on Step 1 of Analgesic Ladder (i.e., Opioid Naive) | Oral Morphine Starting Dose for Patients on Step 2 of Analgesic Ladder (i.e., on “Weak” Opioid) | Indicative Dose Range for Oral Morphine/24 Hours | Dose Increment if Pain Not Controlled | Recommends Starting Morphine via Oral Route |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fallon and Hanks17 | General advice: no specific doses | General advice: no specific doses | 20–1500 | Extra doses same as regular 4-hourly morphine. | Yes |
Usually less than 200 | After 24–48 | ||||
| Regnard and Dean18 | 1 | Convert to equivalent oral morphine dose | 25%–50% every third day but can be faster under supervision. | Yes | |
| 2.5 mg in other patients (= | |||||
| Joint Formulary Committee19 | 5–10 | 20–30 | Up to 500 mg orally 4 hourly (i.e., up to 3000 mg/24 hours) | Fifty percent on next dose if the first dose of morphine is no more effective than the previous analgesic. | Yes |
| Davies20 | No information | No information. | Advice on breakthrough pain | ||
| Ellershaw and Wilkinson21 | General advice: no specific doses | General advice: no specific doses | General advice: no specific doses | No information. | Advice on parenteral use atend of life |
| Regnard and Kindlen22 | 2.5 mg 4 hourly (= | 5 | 5–500 | 50% every third day. | Yes |
Median is 100 | |||||
| Hanks et al.23 | 5 | 10 | Rescue dose (same as 4 hourly dose) can be given as often as required (up to hourly) and total dose of morphine should be reviewed daily. | Yes | |
| Sykes et al.24 | 2.5–5 | General advice: no specific doses | General advice: no specific figures. | Yes | |
| 5–10 | |||||
| Gowans25 | No information | 30 | No maximum dose | No information. | No information |
Reconsider cause of pain when dose | |||||
| Doyle et al.26 | General advice: no specific doses | 10 | 30%–50%. | Yes | |
| Stannard and Booth27 | General advice: no specific doses | General advice: no specific doses | General advice: no specific doses | No information. | Yes |
| Twycross and Wilcock28 | General advice: no specific doses | 10 | Two-thirds never need >30 | 33%–50% every 2–3 days. | Yes |
| 5 | |||||
| Back29 | 2.5 mg 4 hourly in elderly frail | 10 | No preset maximum | 30%–50% every 1–2 days but can be twice a day in severe pain. | Yes |
| 5 | Very few patients require more than 600 | ||||
| SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network)30 | 5–10 | General advice: no specific doses | General advice: no specific doses | No information. | Yes |
| 2.5–5 | |||||
| Twycross et al.31 | General advice: no specific doses | 10 | Two-thirds never need >30 | 33%–50% every 2–3 days. | Yes |
| 5 |
Titration advice also varied. For example, the section of BNF (March 2009) on “Prescribing in Palliative Care” recommended the following after commencing immediate-release morphine solution or tablets every four hours: “If the first dose of morphine is no more effective than the previous analgesic, the next dose (four hours later) should be increased by 50%, the aim being to choose the lowest dose that prevents pain.” Given that the recommended starting dose in the BNF can be as high as 20
mg of normal-release morphine every four hours, this could in theory mean that a patient is started on morphine 20
mg at 8 am, then receives 30
mg at noon, then a further 45
mg at 4 pm increasing to 65
mg at 8 pm, and so on. Additionally, the patient may receive rescue doses of immediate-release morphine. The most recent edition of the BNF32 (September 2009) has changed the upward titration advice from 50% to 30–50% every four hours if required. Despite this recent revision in titration guidance, such a rapid upward titration of morphine does not appear to accurately reflect current palliative care practice in both centers involved in reviewing guidance for this article. Similar titration advice to the BNF appears to also be advocated elsewhere. One such source was accessed on the British Medical Journal's Web site (www.bmj.com) and, therefore, constitutes an easily accessible reference guide for any doctor wanting information on prescribing morphine.33
Finally, although the median expected dose—derived from routine practice—could provide a reference point for an inexperienced prescriber, it was only mentioned in one source of information reviewed. We believe that indicating the usual median dose of morphine is important to make clear that most of the patients do not require high doses. Two articles have provided valuable data regarding median doses and found a median dose of 60
mg of morphine over 24
hours.34, 35 Furthermore, an upper indicative dose limit could help provide guidance for clinicians on when to seek help or revise analgesic management. Walsh and Cheater35 demonstrated that only 1% of patients require more than 600
mg over 24
hours, thereby suggesting an upper limit of morphine for generalist prescribing at 600
mg over 24
hours.
The review of morphine prescribing guidance showed limitations in the following areas:
mg orally per 24 hours.
mg/24
hours, through 3000
mg/24
hours, to statements that there was no maximum dose.
Discussion
Poorly written or incomplete guidance risks delivering an ambiguous message, potentially open to misinterpretation. Those with little experience in prescribing morphine to cancer patients may wrongly conclude that any dose is acceptable and titrate upward regardless of efficacy and side effects. Indeed, some may infer that the only adverse effect of high-dose opioids is sedation and that this is acceptable in cancer patients nearing the ends of their lives. Furthermore, there are a variety of situations where titration must carefully consider factors such as renal, hepatic, and brain impairment. Inconsistent guidelines across the literature are likely to confuse clinicians.
Our review has limitations in that it only reviewed a small section of available guidelines that are commonly used in our localities. Although it may not be widely generalizable, it raises difficult questions about the consistency of available guidance on morphine and other opioids. Therefore, the forthcoming EPCRC-EAPC (European Palliative Care Research Collaborative- European Association for Palliative Care) guidelines next year are to be welcomed. Although their program and aims are ambitious and cover many areas, they should also endeavor to get the fundamentals of our practice, such as morphine prescribing, precise, consistent, and reproducible, so that other guidelines can follow suit.
References
- . Update on cancer pain guidelines. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38:e1–e3
- . Oral morphine for cancer pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(4):CD003868
- . Effects of opioids and sedatives on survival in an Australian inpatient palliative care population. Intern Med J. 2005;35:512–517
- . Benchmarking the use of opioids in the last days of life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34:1–3
- . Opioid use in last week of life and implications for end-of-life decision-making. Lancet. 2000;356:398–399
- . Benchmarking the use of opioids. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008;35:456
- NHS Patient Safety Agency. Ensuring safer practice with high dose ampoules of diamorphine and morphine. Safer Practice Notice, no. 12, May 25, 2006.
- NHS Patient Safety Agency. Reducing dosing errors with opioid medicines. Rapid Response Report NPSA/2008/RRR05, July 4, 2008.
- NHS Patient Safety Agency. Reducing dosing errors with opioid medicines: supporting information. Rapid Response Report NPSA/2008/RRR05, July 2008.
- . Fentanyl patches: serious and fatal overdose from dosing errors, accidental exposure, and inappropriate use. Drug Saf Update. 2008;2(2):2–3
- . GMC clears doctors on accidental morphine overdose. BMJ. 1999;318:1167
- . Inquest begins into deaths after concerns about diamorphine prescribing. BMJ. 2009;338:903
- GMC Fitness to Practice Panel. Available from: http://gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/Macklin_(H)_Minutes_ANON_18–22May09.pdf Accessed November 1, 2009.
- Physicians' attitudes toward pain and the use of opioid analgesics: results of a survey from the Texas Cancer Pain Initiative. South Med J. 2000;93:479–487
- . Oncologists and primary care physicians' attitudes toward pain control and morphine prescribing in France. Cancer. 1995;76:2375–2382
- . Shipman inquiry. Fifth report: safeguarding patients, lessons from the past—proposals for the future. Available from www.the-shipman-inquiry.org.uk2004;
- . ABC of palliative care. 2nd ed.. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing; 2006;
- . A guide to symptom relief in palliative care. 6th ed.. Oxford, United Kingdom: Radcliffe Press; 2010;
- . British National Formulary. 57th ed.. London, United Kingdom: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 2009;
- In: Davies A editors. Cancer related breakthrough pain. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2006;p. 31–56
- . Care of the dying: A pathway to excellence. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2003;52–53
- Regnard C, Kindlen M. Using morphine. (2008) Available from: http://www.helpthehospices.org.uk/clip.
- Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain: the EAPC recommendations. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:587–593
- . Management of advanced disease. 4th ed.. London, United Kingdom: Arnold; 2004;
- . MIMS (Monthly Index of Medical Specialties). London, United Kingdom: Haymarket Medical Media; 2008;
- . Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. 3rd ed.. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2004;
- . Pain pocketbook. 2nd ed.. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone; 2004;45–62
- . Palliative Care Formulary. 3rd ed.. Oxford, United Kingdom: Radcliffe Press; 2008;Available from www.palliativedrugs.com
- . Palliative medicine handbook. 4th ed.. Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom: BPM Books; 2008;Available from http://book.pallcare.info
- . Control of pain in adults with cancer. Guideline No. 106 Edinburgh, United Kingdom: SIGN; 2008;Available from www.sign.ac.uk
- . Symptom management in advanced cancer. 4th ed.. Nottingham, United Kingdom: palliativedrugs.com; 2009;
- . British National Formulary. 58th ed.. London, United Kingdom: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 2009;
- . The role of opioids in cancer pain. BMJ. 2005;331:825–829
- . A regional survey of opioid use by patients receiving specialist palliative care. Palliat Med. 1995;9:229–238
- . Use of morphine for cancer pain. Pharmaceutical Journal. 1983;231:525–528
PII: S0885-3924(09)01135-X
doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.11.240
© 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 39, Issue 2 , Pages e1-e5, February 2010
