Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 40, Issue 2 , Pages 266-278, August 2010

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Comparison of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Low-Dose Transdermal Buprenorphine (BuTrans® Seven-Day Patches) With Buprenorphine Sublingual Tablets (Temgesic®) in Patients With Osteoarthritis Pain

  • Ian G.V. James, MBChB, DCH, DRCOG

      Affiliations

    • Spring House Surgery, Bolton, Lancashire, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Catherine M. O'Brien, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Fincham Statistics, King's Lynn, Norfolk, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Chris J. McDonald, MBBS, MRCOphth, FFPM

      Affiliations

    • Medical Services and Pharmacovigilance, Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Chris J McDonald, MB, BS, Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited, Cambridge Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0GW, United Kingdom.

Accepted 12 January 2010. published online 14 June 2010.

Abstract 

Context

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of chronic pain, particularly in the older population. Modern approaches to the management of OA pain recommend tailoring treatment to the individual. This study examines treatment options for OA pain in the form of low-dose transdermal and sublingual opioid analgesia.

Objectives

The aims of this trial were to compare the efficacy and tolerability of seven-day, low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches (BuTrans®, Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited UK) with sublingual buprenorphine (Temgesic®, Schering-Plough Limited UK) in patients with moderate to severe pain caused by OA of the hip(s) and/or knee(s), and to establish analgesic equivalence of the two products.

Methods

Two hundred forty-six patients with OA pain in the hip(s) and/or knee(s) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study; 110 completed the study. Patients were randomized to receive transdermal buprenorphine patches (5, 10, and 20μg/hour) or sublingual buprenorphine (200 and 400 μg tablets). Their medication was titrated to pain control and they were treated for up to seven weeks. The main outcome measures were pain intensity (primary outcome), sleep disturbance, quality of life, and safety assessments.

Results

Patients' Box Scale-11 pain scores decreased between entry and assessment in both treatment groups. During the 28-day assessment period, the estimated mean treatment differences (95% confidence intervals) were 0.00 (−0.68,0.69), −0.11 (−0.85,0.63), and −0.13 (−0.95,0.68), for the morning, midday, and evening scores, respectively. All the confidence intervals were within the prespecified limits for equivalence (−1.5, 1.5). Use of escape medication was low. In both treatment groups, sleep disturbance caused by pain decreased between entry and assessment. Patients' quality of life improved during the study. Significantly fewer patients receiving the transdermal buprenorphine patches reported nausea (P=0.035), dizziness (P=0.026), and vomiting (P=0.039).

Conclusion

In conclusion, seven-day, low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches are as effective as sublingual buprenorphine, with a better tolerability profile.

Key Words: 7-day, low dose, transdermal, buprenorphine, patches, osteoarthritis, pain, sublingual

 

 This trial was sponsored by Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited, United Kingdom.

PII: S0885-3924(10)00324-6

doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.01.013

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 40, Issue 2 , Pages 266-278, August 2010