Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 40, Issue 2 , Pages 200-216, August 2010

Efficacy of an Intervention for Fatigue and Sleep Disturbance During Cancer Chemotherapy

  • Andrea Barsevick, PhD, RN, AOCN, FAAN

      Affiliations

    • Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Andrea Barsevick, PhD, RN, AOCN, FAAN, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 510 Township Line Road, Cheltenham, PA 19012, USA.
  • ,
  • Susan L. Beck, PhD, RN, FAAN

      Affiliations

    • University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  • ,
  • William N. Dudley, PhD

      Affiliations

    • The School of Health and Human Performance Office of Research, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • Bob Wong, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  • ,
  • Ann M. Berger, PhD, RN, AOCNS, FAAN

      Affiliations

    • University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
  • ,
  • Kyra Whitmer, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  • ,
  • Tracey Newhall, RN, BS, OCN

      Affiliations

    • Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  • ,
  • Susan Brown, RN, OCN, CCRP

      Affiliations

    • Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  • ,
  • Katie Stewart, MSPH

      Affiliations

    • Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Accepted 19 January 2010. published online 21 June 2010.

Abstract 

Context

Multiple complex symptoms from cancer treatment can interfere with functioning.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of an “energy and sleep enhancement” (EASE) intervention to relieve fatigue and sleep disturbance and improve health-related functional status.

Methods

Individuals receiving chemotherapy (CTX) were randomized to the EASE (n=153) or a control intervention (n=139). The EASE intervention included information and behavioral skills taught by an oncology nurse in three telephone sessions. The primary outcomes of fatigue, sleep disturbance, and functional status were measured before CTX, Day 4 after first treatment (baseline), and 43–46 or 57–60 days later (follow-up), depending on the CTX cycle length.

Results

The sample was primarily female (82%) and non-Hispanic white (89%), with mean age of 53.9 years. Fatigue and patient-reported sleep disturbance were elevated in both groups at baseline and follow-up. Actigraphy revealed that the total sleep time was almost eight hours, and sleep percent was greater than 85% for both groups at both time points (normal range). Physical functioning was diminished and at the same level as a sample with serious illness. Mental functioning was in normal range. A repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed no statistically significant group-by-time effects for fatigue, sleep disturbance, or functional status. Unemployed individuals showed greater benefit from the EASE intervention, reporting less pain and symptom interference.

Conclusion

Potential explanations include high variability and/or floor effect for fatigue, incorrect timing of measures, insufficient amount or dose of the intervention, and confounding effects of gender. Future research should consider screening for symptom severity and tailoring interventions.

Key Words: Cancer-related fatigue, sleep disturbance, psychoeducational intervention, randomized controlled trial, telephone counseling, symptom cluster, actigraphy

 

 This study was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NRO4573).

PII: S0885-3924(10)00326-X

doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.12.020

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume 40, Issue 2 , Pages 200-216, August 2010