Advertisement

Effects of a Patient Question Prompt List on Question Asking and Self-Efficacy During Outpatient Palliative Care Appointments

      Abstract

      Context

      Question prompt lists (QPLs) promote participation during medical appointments, including in the context of serious illness care. However, no studies have used parameters of a theoretical framework to examine the effects of QPL use in outpatient palliative care.

      Objectives

      The current pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated use of a 25-question QPL during initial outpatient palliative care appointments. We applied tenets of Self-Efficacy Theory to investigate how use of a QPL affected appointment participation and perceived self-efficacy.

      Methods

      Participants were patients and care partners attending the patient's first palliative care appointment. Participants either received a QPL before the appointment (n = 29 appointments) or usual care (n = 30 appointments). Audio recordings of appointments were coded for total questions asked. Participants reported perceived self-efficacy in question asking pre- and postappointment. Analysis of variance was used to compare appointment participation between study conditions, and a linear mixed effects model was used to compare changes in ratings of perceived self-efficacy.

      Results

      Participants who received the QPL did not ask significantly more questions compared to participants in usual-care appointments. There was a main effect of time on self-efficacy in question asking, such that self-efficacy increased from pre- to postappointment, but there was no effect of the intervention.

      Conclusion

      Despite their promise in previous studies, results of the current study suggest that QPLs may lack potency to shift patient and care partner question asking in palliative care appointments, and that other mechanisms outlined in Self-Efficacy Theory may characterize the relation between question asking and self-efficacy.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gamondi C
        • Larkin P
        • Payne SA
        Core competencies in palliative care: an EAPC white paper on palliative care education.
        Eur J Palliat Care. 2013; 20: 86-91
      1. National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care, Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care, 4th edition, 2018, National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care; Richmond, VA. Available at: https://www.nationalcoalitionhpc.org/ncp. Accessed July 15, 2022.

        • Eggly S
        • Hamel LM
        • Foster TS
        • et al.
        Randomized trial of a question prompt list to increase patient active participation during interactions with black patients and their oncologists.
        Patient Educ and Couns. 2017; 100: 818-826https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.026
        • Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America
        Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century.
        National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC)2001 (PMID: 25057539)
        • Street Jr, RL
        • Gordon H
        • Haidet P.
        Physicians’ communication and perceptions of patients: is it how they look, how they talk, or just the doctor?.
        Soc Sci Med. 2007; 65: 586-598https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.036
        • Doorenbos AZ
        • Levy WC
        • Curtis JR
        • Dougherty CM
        An intervention to enhance goals-of-care communication between heart failure patients and heart failure providers.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016; 52: 353-360https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.03.018
        • Periyakoil VS
        • Neri E
        • Kraemer H.
        A randomized controlled trial comparing the letter project advance directive to traditional advance directive.
        J of Palliat Med. 2017; 20: 954-965https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0066
        • Sansoni JE
        • Grootemaat P
        • Duncan C.
        Question prompt lists in health consultations: a review.
        Patient Educ and Couns. 2015; 98: 1454-1464https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.015
        • Alders I
        • Smits C
        • Brand P
        • van Dulmen S.
        Does patient coaching make a difference in patient-physician communication during specialist consultations? A systematic review.
        Patient Educ and Couns. 2017; 100: 882-896https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.029
        • Clayton JM
        • Butow PN
        • Tattersall MHN
        • et al.
        Randomized controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end-of-life care.
        J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 715-723https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7827
        • Lederer S
        • Fischer MJ
        • Gordon HS
        • et al.
        A question prompt sheet for adult patients with chronic kidney disease.
        BMC Nephrol. 2016; 17: 155https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-016-0362-z
        • Bailey A
        • Mallow J
        • Theeke L.
        Perceived self-efficacy, confidence, and skill among factors of adult patient participation in transitional care: a systematic review of quantitative studies.
        SAGE Open Nursing. 2022; 823779608221074658https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608221074658
        • Haywood K
        • Marshall S
        • Fitzpatrick R.
        Patient participation in the consultation process: a structured review of intervention strategies.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 63: 12-23https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.005
        • Kidd J
        • Marteau TM
        • Robinson S
        • Ukoumunne OC
        • Tydeman C.
        Promoting patient participation in consultations: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of three patient-focused interventions.
        Patient Educ and Couns. 2004; 52: 107-112https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00018-1
        • Bandura A.
        Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ1986
        • Bandura A.
        Self-efficacy: the foundation of agency.
        in: Perrig W.J. Grob A. Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ2000: 17-33
        • Arthur J
        • Yennu S
        • Williams J
        • et al.
        Development of a question prompt sheet for cancer patients receiving outpatient palliative care.
        J Palliat Med. 2016; 19: 883-887https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2015.0545
        • Arthur J
        • Yennu S
        • Zapata KP
        • et al.
        Perception of helpfulness of a question prompt sheet among cancer patients attending outpatient palliative care.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017; 53: 124-130https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.017
        • D'Agostino TA
        • Atkinson TM
        • Latella LE
        Promoting patient participation in healthcare interactions through communication skills training: a systematic review.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2017; 100: 1247-1257
        • Brandes K
        • Butow PN
        • Tattersall MH
        • et al.
        Advanced cancer patients’ and caregivers’ use of a Question Prompt List.
        Patient Educ and Couns. 2014; 97: 30-37
        • Suresh KP.
        An overview of randomization techniques: an unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research.
        J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011; 4: 8-11
      2. Buffington AS, Schwarze ML. Patient preferences project, Wisconsin surgical outcomes research program, 2019, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Madison, WI. Available at: http://www.hipxchange.org/questioncoding. Accessed April 25, 2020.

        • Cegala DJ McClure L
        • Marinelli TM
        • Post DM.
        The effects of communication skills training on patients’ participation during medical interviews.
        Patient Educ and Couns. 2000; 41: 209-222https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00093-8
        • Schwarzer R
        • Jerusalem M.
        • Weinman J.
        • Wright S.
        • Johnston M.
        • Generalized self-efficacy scale
        Measures in health psychology: a user's portfolio.
        Causal Control Beliefs. 1995; 35: 37
        • Williams G
        • Smith AP.
        Using single-item measures to examine the relationships between work, personality, and well-being in the workplace.
        Psychology. 2016; 7: 753-767https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.76078
        • Hoeppner BB
        • Kelly JF
        • Urbanoski KA
        • Slaymaker V.
        Comparative utility of a single-item versus multiple-item measure of self-efficacy in predicting relapse among young adults.
        J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011; 41: 305-312
        • Brown LA
        • Wiley JF
        • Wolitzky-Taylor K
        • Roy-Byrne P
        • Sherbourne C
        • Stein MB
        • et al.
        Changes in self-efficacy and outcome expectancy as predictors of anxiety outcomes from the CALM study.
        Depress Anxiety. 2014; 31: 678-689
        • Bates D
        • Mächler M
        • Bolker B
        • Walker S.
        Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.
        J Stat Softw. 2015; 67: 1-48https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
      3. R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, 2021, R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria. Available at: www.R-project.org. Accessed April 20, 2022.

        • IBM Corp
        IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 28.0.
        IBM Corp, Armonk, NY2021
        • van Buuren S
        • Groothuis-Oudshoorn K.
        Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R.
        J Stat Softw. 2011; 45: 1-67https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
        • Rodenbach RA
        • Brandes K
        • Fiscella K
        • et al.
        Promoting end-of-life discussions in advanced cancer: effects of patient coaching and question prompt lists.
        J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 842-851https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5651
        • Walczak A
        • Butow PN
        • Clayton JM
        • et al.
        Discussing prognosis and end-of-life care in the final year of life: a randomised controlled trial of a nurse-led communication support programme for patients and caregivers.
        BMJ Open. 2014; 4e005745https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005745
        • Brown RF
        • Bylund CL.
        Communication skills training: describing a new conceptual model.
        Acad Med. 2008; 83: 37
        • Kinnersley P
        • Edwards A
        • Hood K
        • et al.
        Interventions before consultations to help patients address their information needs by encouraging question asking: a systematic review.
        BMJ. 2008; 337: a485https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a485
        • Barton E
        • Moore TF
        • Hamel L
        • et al.
        The influence of a question prompt list on patient-oncologist information exchange in an African-American population.
        Patient Educ and Couns. 2020; 103: 505-513https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.020
        • Back AL
        • Arnold RM
        • Baile WF
        • Edwards KA
        • Tulsky JA.
        When praise is worth considering in a difficult conversation.
        Lancet. 2010; 376: 866-867https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61401-8
        • Mroz EL
        • McDarby M
        • Arnold RM
        • et al.
        Empathic communication in specialty palliative care encounters: an analysis of opportunities and responses.
        J Palliat Med. 2022; 25: 1622-1628
        • Pollak KI
        • Gao X
        • Arnold RM
        • et al.
        Feasibility of using communication coaching to teach palliative care clinicians motivational interviewing.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020; 59: 787-793
        • Bergeron C
        • Czajkowska Z
        • Coroiu A
        • et al.
        The impact of physician support on skin self-examination among melanoma patients: a serial mediation model with self-efficacy and intentions to perform skin exams.
        Patient Educ and Couns. 2021; 104: 2364-2370https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.028
        • Hemming K
        • Haines TP
        • Chilton PJ
        • Girling AJ
        • Lilford RJ
        The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: Rationale, design, analysis, and reporting.
        BMJ. 2015; 350: h391https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h391
        • McDarby M
        • Mroz E
        • Carpenter BD
        • Dionne-Odom JN
        • Kamal A.
        A research agenda for the question prompt list in outpatient palliative care.
        J Palliat Med. 2021; 24: 1596-1597