x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Special Series: Tribute to J Randall Curtis
- Engelberg, Ruth ARemove Engelberg, Ruth A filter
- 2020 - 2022Remove 2020 - 2022 filter
Author
- Kross, Erin K2
- Ades, Steven1
- Ardren, Sara S1
- Ashana, Deepshikha Charan1
- Back, Anthony L1
- Balassone, Michael1
- Burns, Stephanie1
- Carson, Shannon S1
- Cheung, Katharine L1
- Choudhury, Summer1
- Cox, Christopher E1
- Diehl, Sandra1
- Ely, Janet1
- Ford, Dee W1
- Kamal, Arif H1
- Khandelwal, Nita1
- Macauley, Robert C1
- Maguire, Jennifer M1
- Marcy, Theodore W1
- McCown, Ellen1
- McEntee, Jennifer J1
- Menon, Prema R1
- Nadig, Nandita R1
- Nielsen, Elizabeth L1
Special Series: Tribute to J Randall Curtis
3 Results
- Special Issue in Honor of J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH
Evolution of Investigating Informed Assent Discussions about CPR in Seriously Ill Patients
Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementVol. 63Issue 6e621–e632Published in issue: June, 2022- Renee D. Stapleton
- Dee W. Ford
- Katherine R. Sterba
- Nandita R. Nadig
- Steven Ades
- Anthony L. Back
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 0Outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain poor. We have spent 10 years investigating an “informed assent” (IA) approach to discussing CPR with chronically ill patients/families. IA is a discussion framework whereby patients extremely unlikely to benefit from CPR are informed that unless they disagree, CPR will not be performed because it will not help achieve their goals, thus removing the burden of decision-making from the patient/family, while they retain an opportunity to disagree. - Special Issue in Honor of J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH
Improving Outcomes Measurement in Palliative Care: The Lasting Impact of Randy Curtis and his Collaborators
Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementVol. 63Issue 6e579–e586Published in issue: June, 2022- Christopher E. Cox
- Deepshikha Charan Ashana
- Nita Khandelwal
- Arif H. Kamal
- Ruth A. Engelberg
Cited in Scopus: 0Palliative care research is deeply challenging for many reasons, not the least of which is the conceptual and operational difficulty of measuring outcomes within a seriously ill population such as critically ill patients and their family members. This manuscript describes how Randy Curtis and his network of collaborators successfully confronted some of the most vexing outcomes measurement problems in the field, and by so doing, have enhanced clinical care and research alike. Beginning with a discussion of the clinical challenges of measurement in palliative care, we then discuss a selection of the novel measures developed by Randy and his collaborators and conclude with a look toward the future evolution of these concepts. - Special Issue in Honor of J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPHOpen Access
Truths, Principles, Maxims, and Other Smart Things We Learned From J. Randall Curtis
Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementVol. 63Issue 6e595–e600Published online: December 29, 2021- Abby R. Rosenberg
- Ruth A. Engelberg
- Erin K. Kross
Cited in Scopus: 0It is a true privilege to work with a colleague who can consistently teach and inspire those around him. We are fortunate to have worked with Dr. J. Randall (“Randy”) Curtis for most of our careers. We have been his mentees, collaborators, peers, and – for the past seven years – his co-Directors on a National Institutes of Health (NIH) palliative care research training grant.1 In these roles, we have watched Randy mentor and advise over 50 trainees and faculty who share his goals of advancing clinical research and improving the experiences of patients with serious illness and their families.